\

Sarah. 25. S. FL.

Scorpio stuck in Babylon. Football enthusiast- Seminoles and NY Giants. Animal lover. Gryffindor forever. Owned by my mutt Caiden. Fascinated by taxidermy. Car finatic (forced induction = easy way to my <3 ) I have a thing for large gauge septums
i hate et, onions, and most chick flicks

hit counter
free counters

 

becomming:

xlizardx:

Apparently this is "The clearest photo of Mercury ever taken."

why isnt everyone getting so excited about this, it is literally another planet look at how beautiful it is stop what your doing and look at how alien like this planet is what is living there oh my god mercury

becomming:

xlizardx:

Apparently this is "The clearest photo of Mercury ever taken."

why isnt everyone getting so excited about this, it is literally another planet look at how beautiful it is stop what your doing and look at how alien like this planet is what is living there oh my god mercury

releasings:

hobbitdragon:

ddollley:

I just made the most inhuman noise

WHEN IT REALIZES THE PERSON IS STILL THERE AND GOES BACK TO BEING ‘DEAD’

oh my god

releasings:

hobbitdragon:

ddollley:

I just made the most inhuman noise

WHEN IT REALIZES THE PERSON IS STILL THERE AND GOES BACK TO BEING ‘DEAD’

oh my god

(Source: cineraria)

The Trouble With Too Much T

appropriately-inappropriate:

jaycemonde:

redressalert:

queen-nanny:

The first evidence of this new policy in action was published last year in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. Four female athletes, ages 18 to 21, all from developing countries, were investigated for high testosterone. Three were identified as having atypically high testosterone after undergoing universal doping tests. (They were not suspected of doping: Tests clearly distinguish between doping and naturally occurring testosterone.)

Sports officials (the report does not identify their governing-body affiliation) sent the young women to a medical center in France, where they were put through examinations that included blood tests, genital inspections, magnetic resonance imaging, X-rays and psychosexual history — many of the same invasive procedures Ms. Semenya endured. Since the athletes were all born as girls but also had internal testes that produce unusually high levels of testosterone for a woman, doctors proposed removing the women’s gonads and partially removing their clitorises. All four agreed to undergo both procedures; a year later, they were allowed to return to competition.

The doctors who performed the surgeries and wrote the report acknowledged that there was no medical reason for the procedures. Quite simply, these young female athletes were required to have drastic, unnecessary and irreversible medical interventions if they wished to continue in their sports.

Many conditions can lead to naturally high testosterone, including polycystic ovarian syndrome or an ovarian tumor during pregnancy, but women with intersex traits tend to have the highest T levels. And it is these intersex traits that sports authorities want “corrected.”

Sports authorities argue that screening for high T levels is needed to keep women’s athletics fair, reasoning that testosterone improves performance. Elite male athletes generally outperform women, and this difference has been attributed to men’s higher testosterone levels. Ergo, women with naturally high testosterone are thought to have an unfair advantage over other women.

But these assumptions do not match the science. A new study in Clinical Endocrinology fits with other emerging research on the relationship between natural testosterone and performance, especially in elite athletes, which shows that T levels can’t predict who will run faster, lift more weight or fight harder to win. The study, of a sample of 693 elite athletes, revealed a significant overlap in testosterone levels among men and women: 16.5 percent of the elite male athletes had testosterone in the so-called female range; nearly 14 percent of the women were above the “female” range.

This finding undermines the idea that sex-linked performance differences are mainly because of testosterone. The authors suggest that lean body mass, rather than hormone levels, may better explain the performance gap. They also conclude that their research makes the I.O.C.’s testosterone-guided eligibility policy for women “untenable.”

Some might argue that the procedures used to lower T levels are simply part of the price athletes must pay to compete at the elite level. But these choices aren’t temporary hardships like training far from home or following a rigorous diet. The required drug and surgical treatments are irreversible and medically unjustifiable. Clitoral surgery impairs sexual function and sensation; gonadectomy causes sterility; and hormone-suppressive drugs have side effects with potentially lifelong health risks.

Moreover, the policy places a disproportionate burden on poor women who may have limited career opportunities and are likely to face enormous pressure to submit to these interventions in order to continue their athletic careers. Under the current policies, more and more female athletes with naturally high T levels will be confronted with these harsh choices — and not just at the elite level. The I.O.C. requires that each country’s Olympic committee investigate cases of female athletes with high T levels before naming them to national teams. Some countries, like India, now apply such policies to all female athletes, not just those competing internationally.

Barring female athletes with high testosterone levels from competition is a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. Worse, it is pushing young women into a choice they shouldn’t have to make: either to accept medically unnecessary interventions with harmful side effects or to give up their future in sports.

Every once in awhile, you’ll read something and it is so horrifying, so undistilled in its blatant misogyny, in the hatred of the female body that it will take your breath away.  The price for stepping out of line (here, by competing; by being an athlete) is literally getting your clit snipped.  Note:  as has already been stated in the article, the ONLY thing that makes people better athletes is lean muscle mass.  But testosterone, being the holy grail of mail fantasticness, is all it takes, right?  Anything males have more of, that’s all we need to know.  

Everyone wants to “normalize” female outliers, one way or the other.

It’s disgusting that nobody seems to be bringing up the transphobic elements in these procedures.

If a doctor or sports committee or some shit tried to do anything like that to me or anybody I knew, they’d find themselves in a dumpster, I fucking swear.

You know what else is super disgusting?

That you’re going to take this opportunity—the systematic mutilation of females who don’t fit the “approved” ideal of the female athlete by offering them the Sophie’s Choice of genital mutilation or no career—to grandstand about

A) an issue that is in no way relevant to the conversation (because we’re not talking about trans women, we’re talking about females being mutilated to suit a male-determined ideal

And

B) what would happen if it were you.

Nobody gives a shit if you’d leave someone in a ditch because this is not about you. Nobody cares what you would do, because YOU are not who we’re talking about.

When you pull this shit, talking about “future implications”, all I read is, “fuck those bitches, it could happen to /me/ next!!1!”
Focus on the women who are being hurt by this right now. Don’t try to derail from the PRESENT implications to suit YOUR needs.

Focus on the women who are actually being hurt, instead of using their pain to spout these Rambo revenge fantasies.
You ought a be ashamed.

lindsaylohoean:

me when someone keeps making jokes about something that im really passionate about

image